Published January 2023, Pg. 45-51
Section: Economy, management and law
UOT: 622:338
DOI: 10.37474/0365-8554/2023-1-45-51
The social-economic efficiency of measures on the development of safe labor conditions in oil field enterprises
R.K. Iskenderov Dr. in Ec. Sc. - Azerbaijan Technical UniversityThe paper studies the social-economic efficiency of the measures towards the development of safe conditions of labor in the industrial enterprises. The necessity of the advancement of corresponding legal framework is shown, and various aspects defining industrial safety are characterized as well. The basic procedures of ensuring safe working environment, and the evaluation of the social-economic efficiency of the measures towards the labor protection in the industrial enterprises are reviewed, and the perspectives of its enhancement shown. Special attention is paid to the issues of the monetary evaluation of the measures carried out towards improving the safety of labor conditions; the reasons for the variety of approaches to the estimation of the social injury are studied as well. With the purpose of development of safe working environment in an industrial enterprise, the views on the perspectives of the advancement of the organization of control in the working places are offered. The possibilities of the minimization of the social-economic losses in the system of labor protection are specified..
References:
1. Shchurikova L.G., Galiyeva S.I., Garipova O.N. Osnovnye napravleniya politiki organizatsii v oblasti okhrany truda pri primenenii nanotekhnologiy // Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2011, s. 187-191.
2. Kyung-Taek Rim, Cheol-Hong Lim. Biologically Hazardous agents at work and efforts to protect workers’ health: A Review of Recent Reports. Saf Health Work. 2014, June 5(2), pp. 43–52. Published online 2014 Apr 5. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw. 2014.03.006
3. Mohammed Mahdi, Abdul Rahim Ahmad, Roslan Ismail, Hayder Natiq Kadhim. Solution for Information Overload Using Faceted Search – A Review. June 2020. IEEE Access 8:1-1. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005536
4. Terje Aven. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation // European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 16, August 2016, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 Get rights and content).
5. Lukas Prinz, Anna Pegels. The role of labour power in sustainability transitions: Insights from comparative political economy on Germany’s electricity transition // Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 41, July 2018, pp. 210-219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.erss.2018.04.010 Get rights and content
6. Frank W. Geels. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms / Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1 (2011), pp.24-40, journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eist).
7. Olsson M. Employment protection and sickness absence. Labour Econ., 16 (2) (2009), pp. 208-214.
8. Bassanini A., Nunziata L., Venn D. Job protection legislation and productivity growth in OECD countries. Econ. Policy, 24 (2009), pp. 349-402.
9. Belot M., Boone J., Van Ours J. Welfare-improving employment protection. Economica, 74 (295) (2007), pp. 381-396.
10. Ima Ilyani Ibrahim, Sarina Muhamad Noor, Noraini Nasirun,Zulaiha Ahmad. Favorable Working Environment in Promoting Safety at Workplace. Journal of ASIAN Behavioral Studies, Sep. / Oct. (8), pp. 19-27, s. 19. January 2013. DOI:10.21834/jabs.v3i8.279
11. Heyman F., Skedinger P.. Employment protection reform, enforcement in collective agreements and worker flows. Ind. Relat., 55 (4) (2016), pp. 662-704.
12. Rosalía Díaz-Carrión, Virginia Navajas-Romero and José Carlos Casas-Rosal. Comparing working conditions and job satisfaction in hospitality workers across Europe. Published online 2020 Jul 23 / Int J Hosp Manag., 2020 Sep; 90, 102631. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102631
13. Okhrana truda – osnova budushchego sfery truda. Opirayas na stoletniy opyt / Gruppa tekhnicheskoy podderzhki po voprosam dostoynogo truda i Byuro MOT dlya stran Vostochnoy Yevropy i Tsentral´noy Azii. – Moskva: MOT, 2019, 75 s.
14. Vertakova, Yulia, Maltseva Irina. Labor productivity: analysis of the current level and identification of opportunities for its growth Productividad laboral: análisisn del nivel actual e identificación de oportunidades para su crecimiento Vol. 41 (27) 2020. Publicado/Published: 23/07/2020
15. Chen Z., Lin H., Chen M., Liu D., Bao Y., Ding Y. A framework for sharing and integrating remote sensing and GIS models based on web service. Sci. World J., 2014 (2014), pp. 1-13, 10.1155/2014/354919.
16. Ekonomika bezopasnosti truda. – SPb, 2013, 58 s.
17. Dobrolyubova E.I. Mezhdunarodniy opyt otsenki rezul´tativnosti i effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo kontrolya v sfere okhrany truda i obespecheniya bezopasnosti na rabochem meste // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipial´nogo upravleniya, 2016, No 2, s. 96-107.
18. Gorbunov S.V., Gryaznov S.N., Il´kov A.V., Malyshev V.P., Puchkov M.V. Organizatsiya monitoringa i prognozirovaniya chrezvychainykh situatsiy // Strategiya grazhdanskoy zashchity: problemy i issledovaniya, 2015, s. 56-70.
19. Shishkina A.A. Analiz metodov matematicheskikh issledovaniy usloviy i bezopasnosti trudatekst. Izvestiya Tul´skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2021, vyp. 10, s. 323-325.
20. Belenkiy V.M. Modeli i metody upravleniya bezopasnost´yu truda proizvodstvennogo personala. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora tekhnicheskikh nauk, 05.13.10, 2014, 298 s.
21. Valeria Saladino, Davide Algeri and Vincenzo Auriemma. The Psychological and Social Impact of Covid-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being. Front. Psychol., 02 October 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.577684.
