Published October 2023, Pg. 10-16

Section: Oil and gas field development and exploitation

UOT: 622.276

DOI: 10.37474/0365-8554/2023-10-10-16

On the decision-making on the choice of GTM - assessment of the current status and development perspective

S.V. Abbasova Cand. in Tech. Sc. - Azerbaijan State University of the Oil and Industry

A.I. Koyshina Cand. in Tech. Sc. - The Caspian State University of Technology and Engineering named Sh.Yessenov

This article analyzes the current state of problems associated with the choice of well interventions based on the analysis of accumulated scientific and practical experience for various fields. Let us note the fact that recently there has been a development and improvement of analytical methods for forecasting indicators, followed by the adoption of an informed decision, the implementation of which allows improving the quality of conducted geological and technical measures. The accumulated experience of research work makes it possible to solve the problems of creating a methodology on an integrated basis with its mathematical, software and information support in order to optimize the planning process of geological and technical operations, to develop the structure of automated systems and algorithms for their functioning, it was possible to build linear and multiplicative algorithms based on the transformation of reservoir characteristics into the form relevant factors, the purpose of which is to express the dependence of the effectiveness of measures taken on the characteristics formed.

References:

1. Dyabin A.G. Sorokin A.YA, Stupochenko V.E. Primenenie tekhnologij povysheniya nefteotdachi nauchno-proizvodstvennym centrom OAO “RMNTK “Nefteotdacha” // Neftyanoe Hozyajstvo, 2000, № 12, s. 16-18.

2. Safonov E.N., Almaev R.H. Primenenie novyh metodov uvelicheniya nefteotdachi na mestorozhdeniyah Bashkorkostana // Neftyanoe hozyajstvo, 2002, № 4, s. 38-40.

3. Fahretdinov R.N., Kaledin YU.A., ZHitkova M.V. Potencial sovremennyh informacionnyh tekhnologij pri ocenke effektivnosti metodov uvelicheniya nefteotdachi // Neftyanoe hozyajstvo, 2001, № 3, s. 54-55.

4. Hasanov M.M, Muhamedshin R.K., Hatmullin I.F. Komp’yuternye tekhnologii resheniya mnogokriterial’nyh zadach monitoringa razrabotki neftyanyh mestorozhdenij // Vestnik inzhiniringovogo centra YUKOS, 2001, № 2, s. 26-29.

5. Kazakov A.A. Metodicheskoe obespechenie edinyh podhodov ocenki effektivnosti metodov PNP // Tekhnologii TEK, 2003, № 2, s. 47-53.

6. Kazakov A.A. Metodika ocenki effektivnosti GTM po krivym padeniya debita nefti // Neftyanoe Hozyajstvo, 1999, № 12, s. 31-34.

7. SHahverdiev A.H., Panahov G.M., Abbasov E.M., Rasulova S.R. O vozmozhnosti regulirovaniya vyazkostnoj anomalii v geterogennyh smesyah // Vestnik RAEN, 2014, № 1, s.28-33.

8. Syrtlanov V.R., Kadochnikova L.M., Trushnikova O.M. Metodiki ocenki effektivnosti GTM na osnove trekhmernogo gidrodinamicheskogo modelirovaniya // Neftyanoe Hozyajstvo, 2002, № 6, s. 38-40.

9. Gluhih I.N., P’yankov V.N., Zabolotnov A.R. Situacionnye modeli v korporativnyh bazah znanij GTM // Neftyanoe hozyajstvo, 2002, № 6, s. 45-48.

10. SHpurov A.V., P’yankov V.N., Klochkov A.A., Brilliant L.S. Planirovanie effektivnosti GTM pri prognozirovanii dobychi nefti // Neftyanoe hozyajstvo, 2000, № 9, s. 105-108.

11. P’yankov V.N., Filev A.I. Integral’nyj programmnyj kompleks “Baspro-analitik” // Neftyanoe Hozyajstvo, 2000, № 9, s. 109-114.

12. Sarvaretdinov R.G., Gil’manova R.H., Hisamov R.S. i dr. Formirovanie bazy dannyh dlya razrabotki GTM optimizacii dobychi nefti // Neftyanoe Hozyajstvo, 2001, № 8, s. 32-35.

13. http:/www.nitpo.ru/science/ourwor.ks/article11.html

14. Abasov M.T., Efendiev G.M., Strekov A.S. i dr. Ocenka sravnitel’noj effektivnosti geologo-tekhnicheskih meropriya¬tij po kompleksnoj informacii // Neftyanoe Hozyajstvo, 2003, № 10, s.70-73.

15. Strekov A.S., Mamedov P.Z., Koyshina A.I. Decisions-making on the choice of geological and technical measures under uncertainty / Seventh International Conference on Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions in System Analysis, Decision and Control, Izmir, Turkey September 2-3, 2013, pp. 381-384.

16. Koltun A.A. Ocenka effektivnosti i optimal’noe planirovanie geologo-tekhnicheskih meropriyatij na neftyanyh mestorozhdeniyah. Dis. kand. nauk. Moskva, 2005, 112 s.

17. Miheev P.S. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema podderzhki prinyatiya resheniya o vybore parametrov geologo-tekhnicheskih meropriyatij na osnove gidrodinamicheskih modelej. Dis. kand. nauk. Ufa, 2006, 162 s.

18. A. Cottini-Loureiro, SPE, and М. Araujo, SPE. Optimized Well Location by Combination of Multiple Realization Approach and Quality Map Methods, Imperial C., 2005 Society of Petroleum Engineers. - SPE 95413.

19. Silich V.A., Komagorov V.P., Savel’ev A.O., Alekseev A.A. Postroenie informacionnoj sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya reshenij pri vybore vida geologo-tekhnicheskogo meropriyatiya na neftedobyvayushchej skvazhine. Doklady TUSURa, Informacionnye tekhnologii, № 2 (24), chast’ 2, 2011, s. 295-299.

20. Ilyushin P.Yu., Rahimzyanov R.M., Solov’ev D.Yu., Kolychev I.Yu. Analiz provedeniya geologo-tekhnicheskih meropriyatij po uvelicheniyu produktivnosti dobyvayushchih skvazhin na neftyanyh mestorozhdeniyah Permskogo kraya. Vestnik Permskogo nacional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiya, neftegazovoe i gornoe delo. Perm’, 2015, № 15, s. 81-89.